YouTube/Low-bridge videos: Are they good? Are they bad? Are they writing?

Michael Wesch seems to think that digital text is the same as written text, but with less of a linear nature. It also transcends distances and can bypass traditional publishers to reach a worldwide audience in mere seconds. As for Anderson's "low-bridge" technology serving as a type of universal education tool, I can see how it would spark interest in students, but keeping the technology simple so as to not discourage students would be more difficult. I believe that creativity is a major part of motivation; Anderson is on the right track with that statement. However, exercising that creativity in a way that promotes learning is the trick.

I think that there is a connection between writing and video, but the connection is only as deep as the writer/director wants it to be. As much as writing can be internalized and the rule memorized, the same can be said of video directing and editing. The level of planning can then vary with individuals. I know that minimal planning beyond basic brainstorming in my own group was used to plan our video. We're sort of flying by the seat of our pants, but at least we know where we're headed.